Diana Gabaldon, “Outlander”

Careful, now. The electronic version of Outlander doesn’t bear a warning label, but it should. It would say something like, “Reading this book may cause complete absorption in an imaginary world. Side effects could include missing deadlines, neglecting children, skipping meetings, excessive daydreaming and faint dissatisfaction with real life.” I could print a bunch of labels with this warning and go slap them onto copies in the nearest book store, just so the readers of America might get through the holidays with a modicum of efficiency. But I suspect the Starz mini-series has probably gotten everyone all excited about time travel and handsome kilted redheads, and my warning would go unheeded.

Standing Stones of Callanish. A stone like one of these launches Claire back in time.

Standing Stones of Callanish. A stone like one of these launches Claire back in time.

Here’s the thing about Outlander: it’s so much better than you might think. I’ve missed out on Diana Gabaldon’s books largely, I think, because book stores and Amazon have classed them as romance novels. Which they are, in part. The central relationship in Outlander is between the plucky sardonic Claire Beauchamp and the glamorous Scot Jamie Fraser. Of course the crucial element to any romance novel is the force that’s going to prevent the interesting couple from uniting, or that will tear them apart. Gabaldon’s got a doozy: Claire is a 20th century person, while Jamie lives 200 years earlier. Claire gets catapulted backward in time when she visits a ring of standing stones near Inverness just after World War II. It’s a great device, because everything we’d want to know about Highland Scotland in that period is as strange to her as it is to us, so the usual historical-novel exposition is presented as Claire’s discovery. What’s more there are plenty of other sources of conflict. The adorable Jamie is a wanted man, outlawed by the English who rule Scotland. He’s made an enemy of a sadistic English army officer, Jonathan Randall, who is not only the ancestor but also the very image of Claire’s 20th century husband. So adventures ensue. Cue galloping through the heather, cold castles, endless violence and lots of sex. Some of it in the heather, some in the cold castles. Claire gets herself in trouble, Jamie rescues her; Jamie gets himself in trouble, Claire rescues him. And always, the gulf of 200 years between them looms. But that’s a reductive way to talk about Outlander, because Gabaldon writes with energy, elegance, and a sense of humor (not a standard component in escape literature). In fact at times, Outlander reminded me of my personal historical-fiction benchmark, the Lymond novels of Dorothy Dunnett. Not just for the Scottish component, but because Outlander, like the Dunnett books, lets you live vicariously at a high pitch of drama. So when you put the book down, you look around somewhat befuddled. In fact, you’ve time-traveled. Nice trick, Ms. Gabaldon!

About carolwallace

I spend most of my time writing and reading. Most recent publications: the reissue of "To Marry an English Lord,"one of the inspirations for "Downton Abbey," and the historical novel "Leaving Van Gogh." I am too cranky to belong to a book group but I love the book-blogging community.
This entry was posted in best seller, historical fiction and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Diana Gabaldon, “Outlander”

  1. I’ve put this book aside after only four chapters. Somebody at my November book club (where we pick next year’s books) made this her choice, so I figure I’ll pick it up in 2015. And, durn, you’re a fast reader! BTW, my selection is “Boys in the Boat!”

    • carolwallace says:

      Well, now your book group has two terrific reads in store, Barb! And yes, I do read fast, but remember my transit time is all on the subway. I bet I get 3-4 hours/week more reading time than you do.

  2. I’ve read the whole series and love them all!

  3. Janet Elliott says:

    I agree that Gabaldon’s books are misplaced in bookstores, where they are always placed in the Romance section. I love these books and have read them all twice. They are such big books that by the time i finished the last one, many details of the first books had slipped my mind. I’m so glad you are enjoying them!

    • carolwallace says:

      Oh, thanks for weighing in, Janet! I have to admit I’ve stopped halfway through “The Fiery Cross” but I’m not giving up — I’m just saving the rest of them. So many hours of reading pleasure here! Have you read Dorothy Dunnett’s “Lymond” books? They’re similarly gripping, partly because like the Gabaldons they have a fabulous hero. Plots a little too complex for my foggy brain, but I’ve read ’em all 3 or 4 times anyway… First one’s set in Scotland….

  4. Pingback: Hermione Ranfurly, “To War with Whitaker” | Book Group of One

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s