John Galsworthy, “The Man of Property”

I spent almost as much time with The Man of Property as I did with Ken Follett’s Fall of Giantswhich is three times as long, and the reading experience was strangely inverse in nature. Follett’s book spans over 20 years of Euro-American history, hitting the high spots and aiming to keep the pages turning. John Galsworthy isn’t at all interested in plot and The Man of Property moves very slowly over the course of a few months in 1886. It’s set in a narrow slice of society, the upper middle class of London. But the most important difference is that while Follett places his invented characters into historical episodes, Galsworthy focuses his microscope so closely on the members of the Forsyte family that they take on universality. I must say, this novel was very slow going, especially at first, as Galsworthy lumbers through the family relationships, gradually exposing the sources of dramatic tension. Yet in the end, it was hugely satisfying because the main characters really come to life. I won’t be reading the next Follett book in this trilogy, but I moved on right away to the next novel in what’s now known as “The Forsyte Saga.” (Yes, as in the TV series that introduced us to Damian Lewis.)

John Galsworthy, a Forsyte by upbringing but not by temperament.

Galsworthy’s drama arises stems from his characters’ collisions with the values and practices of their class. The Forsytes are a large clan — nine elderly siblings survive at the book’s opening. Most of them are rich, and intend to hang onto their money, while still spending enough to be “respectable.” But human nature erupts through the controlled, predictable behaviors expected of the Forsytes, most notably in Soames Forsyte’s marriage. Soames is that complex creation, an unsympathetic character who nevertheless excites the reader’s compassion. He is a lawyer, cautious and analytical, but rashly married the beautiful and poor Irene Heron — who doesn’t love him. Has never loved him, has never made any pretense of loving him. In an impetuous moment, Soames commissions a country house from his cousin June’s fiancé Philip Bosinney. Bosinney, aside from being handsome enough for the family to nickname him “The Buccaneer,” is somewhat Bohemian, more motivated by his artistic judgments than by money. Irene and Bosinney fall in love.

It doesn’t end well. It couldn’t, really. Galsworthy is setting up the Forsyte family to stand in for the bourgeoisie of the English empire, and he intends to demonstrate how their obsession with property interferes with human relations. He makes this very clear, using “Forsyte” as a general term for the upper middle class. His achievement is making these archetypes into believable, compelling characters whom we are willing to follow through a suspense-free narrative.

Galsworthy’s biography adds a few interesting details to the reading. First, that he had an affair with (and later married) his cousin’s wife and that her middle name was Nemesis. The relationship seems to have inspired the Soames/Irene/Bosinney triangle. Second, if I read the bio correctly, The Man of Property was initially a play, which explains its structure as a series of conversations or dialogues in different, largely domestic settings. And finally, Galsworthy won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1932.

About carolwallace

I spend most of my time writing and reading. Most recent publications: the reissue of "To Marry an English Lord,"one of the inspirations for "Downton Abbey," and the historical novel "Leaving Van Gogh." I am too cranky to belong to a book group but I love the book-blogging community.
This entry was posted in anglophilia, classic, literary fiction and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to John Galsworthy, “The Man of Property”

  1. Alex says:

    Some friends and I were discussing the television versions of the saga last week and came to the conclusion that the earlier black and white version was far better than the later one. Did you ever see it?

    • carolwallace says:

      No, Alex, I haven’t seen it — only the more recent version. I would think a slower pace would be better, though, and assume that anything made in b&w is going to slower and in some ways, more satisfying. Beetling over to Netflix right now to see if either version streams. Wouldn’t that be handy!

      • Alex says:

        Wouldn’t it indeed. The earlier version was twenty-six episodes and very complete. The cast list contained every great name from the late 60s. I know it’s now available on DVD but whether or not you can stream it I haven’t investigated.

  2. Pingback: Follow my book blog, “Book Group of One” | | Carol Wallace BooksCarol Wallace Books

  3. Pingback: John Galsworthy, “The Forsyte Saga, Vol. 2″ | Book Group of One

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s