Nathaniel Philbrick, “Why Read Moby-Dick?”

“There are no tricks — there is only enthusiasm.” That, according to my admittedly flawed memory, is legendary femme fatale Pamela Harriman’s explanation of how she managed to ensnare so many powerful men in her lifetime. My husband takes this to mean that men are pathetically easy to please, but I think the message is broader: eagerness to share your pleasure has powerful appeal. You could, if you wanted to be snarky, say that Nathaniel Philbrick’s Why Read Moby-Dick? is just a high-brow fan magazine. But you’d have to have a pretty hard heart to resist Philbrick’s ardor for what he calls “the greatest American novel ever written.”

Not white, not Moby, but a sperm whale

He starts — oh, very cleverly! — on December 16, 1850, a moment Herman Melville wrote into the novel, bringing himself to the foreground of the fiction as he composed the novel. This attention to Melville’s self-referential moment puts the struggling, sympathetic young author in front of us as he wrestles with this massive, unwieldy narrative. Then Philbrick moves back to give us some context, both for Melville and for the United States of America in 1850. This was the year the Fugitive Slave Act was passed, and Philbrick sees Moby-Dick as, among other things, a rumination on the toxic existence of slavery in the supposedly democratic United States. But he points out that the book is not an allegory: while mad Captain Ahab might see the great white whale as a symbol of the evil in the world, Nathaniel Philbrick draws our attention to Moby Dick’s detailed physical presence: “In the end he is just a huge, battle-scarred albino sperm whale, and that is more than enough.”

Well — yes and no. There’s a constant toggling back and forth in Philbrick’s book, between Moby-Dick and Melville, between the chronology of the fiction and the chronology of its author. But that reiterating shift in focus just mirrors Melville’s own disconcerting slipping among whales, THE whale, and “the whale” (standing in for something much larger). They are all interwoven, and Philbrick helps us appreciate how the liveliness and convincing quality of Melville’s imagined episodes function on several levels.

Philbrick comes to this material naturally: ten years ago he won a National Book Award for In the Heart of the Sea, which recounted the tragic 1819 voyage of the whaler Essex. This was the incident that provided the seed for Moby-Dick. Since then Philbrick has written on other big stories in the history of nineteenth-century America (Custer; the exploration of the American interior) and he has an easy authority with the subject at hand. Combine that with his elegant style, some acute literary analysis, and, yes, his enthusiasm, and you’ve got a delightful little book.

About carolwallace

I spend most of my time writing and reading. Most recent publications: the reissue of "To Marry an English Lord,"one of the inspirations for "Downton Abbey," and the historical novel "Leaving Van Gogh." I am too cranky to belong to a book group but I love the book-blogging community.
This entry was posted in classic, nonfiction, scholarly and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Nathaniel Philbrick, “Why Read Moby-Dick?”

  1. This sounds kind of like what I was expecting, a mix of real expertise and pure enthusiasm.

    I think that Philbrick book about exploring the interior may actually be about the exterior, about a massive ocean-going expedition. If you mean Sea of Glory it’s a dang masterpiece.

    • carolwallace says:

      Gosh, thanks, Tom for setting me straight so gently. “Sea of Glory” actually sounds fabulous, even to someone who thinks of reading nonfiction as more or less eating my vegetables.

  2. Ginny Arndt says:

    Try listening to Moby Dick on tape or disk when you have a long car drive. Melville is a poet in his prose. Wonderful listening. G. Arndt

  3. carolwallace says:

    Oh, Ginny, that sounds like a wonderful idea. Philbrick points out how much Melville was influenced by both the Bible and Shakespeare in his writing and when I read “Moby-Dick” in May I was often brought to a standstill by the beauty of the prose. I bet it does sound glorious!

  4. Lisa says:

    I’ve never read Moby-Dick – itimidated by reputation, now that I think about it. Maybe I should start with Philbrick and then work up to Melville.

    • carolwallace says:

      Oh, why not just grab the Thing Itself, Lisa? Philbrick is terrific, but Moby-Dick is the main event. Just try a few chapters. And if it doesn’t suit you now, it may at a later point. (Not a test, no grade, you don’t have to finish…. we’re grownups now!)

  5. I plan to reread this in 2012 — this time not in dribs and drabs, but in a one or two week run. I think it will be better that way.

  6. carolwallace says:

    I agree, Marie-Therese, it probably is better in a few big chunks. That’s actually something I’ve been thinking about a lot lately — how the pace at which we read a book affects our reading. We can’t always control how much time we devote to a book but I do think deep immersion is better…. OTOH so many of those Victorian tomes were written as serials so maybe I’m wrong!

  7. Pingback: Follow my book blog, “Book Group of One” | | Carol Wallace BooksCarol Wallace Books

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s